Roberson v. Helder

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the sentence imposed on plaintiff by the District Court of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the District Court of Fayetteville, Arkansas for re-sentencing within 120 days of the date of this Order, failing which the charges against him shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on June 8, 2011. (Certified Copy of this Order mailed to District Court of Fayetteville, AR)(aw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION TRAVIS R. ROBERSON v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 11-5001 TIM HELDER, Sheriff of Washington County, Arkansas DEFENDANT O R D E R Now on this 8th day of June, 2011, come on for consideration the parties' Joint Motion To Remand To The Fayetteville District Court (document #18) and the Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation (document #19), to which no objections have been made. The Court, having carefully reviewed said Report And Recommendation, finds that it is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation is adopted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation, plaintiff's Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the sentence imposed on plaintiff by the District Court of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the District Court of Fayetteville, Arkansas for re-sentencing within 120 days of the date of this Order, failing which the charges against him shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?