Bogan v. Fayetteville Police Department et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, denying IFP application and dismissing plaintiff's complaint re 3 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 16, 2011. (tg)

Download PDF
Bogan v. Fayetteville Police Department et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION KEITHON EARL BOGAN v. Civil No. 11-5010 PLAINTIFF FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; POLICE OFFICER T. SHEPHERD; POLICE OFFICER B. POTTER; and PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JOHN THREET ORDER DEFENDANTS Now on this 16th day of March, 2011, comes on for consideration the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #3), to which there are no objections, and the Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report And Recommendation is sound in all respects, and should be adopted in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report And Recommendation Of The Magistrate Judge (document #3) is adopted in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's IFP application is denied and the complaint is dismissed. The claims asserted are frivolous, fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted, are asserted against individuals immune from suit, or are not presently cognizable. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The dismissal of this case will count as a strike under the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The clerk is directed to enter a 1915(g) strike flag on the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?