Parsons v. Reese et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on April 9, 2012. (src)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
JOHNNY ADAM PARSONS
PLAINTIFF
v.
Civil No. 12-5004
JAILER REESE, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
O R D E R
Now on this 9th day of April, 2012, comes on for consideration
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9)
filed on February 28, 2012, to which no objections have been filed.
As
the
docket
sheet
in
this
case
reflects,
the
Clerk
originally mailed the Report and Recommendation to plaintiff at the
Washington County Jail. On March 12, 2012, the mail to plaintiff
was returned undeliverable.
The Clerk located a new address for
plaintiff per the Arkansas Department of Corrections’ website and,
on March 14, 2012, the Clerk resent the Report and Recommendation
to the new address.
returned.
The second mailing to plaintiff has not been
Plaintiff
Recommendation.
has
not
objected
to
the
Report
and
Nor has he contacted the Court since January 24,
2012, when he filed his amended complaint, despite the Magistrate
Judge’s Order that he complete a § 1983 form to use for filing an
amended complaint.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds
that it is sound in all respects and should be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) is hereby adopted in toto; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Magistrate Judge’ Report and Recommendation, plaintiff’s complaint
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to obey an order of the
Court and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/JIMM LARRY HENDREN
JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?