Hays v. Williams Law Firm, The et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis but Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed because it is frivolous, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from suit. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 27, 2012. (tg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
STEVEN J. HAYS

PLAINTIFF

v.

Civil No. 12-5034

THE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM;
THE MUNICIPALITY OF GENTRY, ARKANSAS;
and THE MUNICIPALITY OF HIGHFILL, ARKANSAS

DEFENDANTS

O R D E R
NOW on this 27th day of March 2012, comes on for consideration
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4), filed on
February 29, 2012, to which no objections have been filed.

The

Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds it sound
in all respects and finds that it should be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 4) is hereby adopted in toto;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion to
Proceed IFP (Doc. 4) is hereby granted, but Plaintiff’s Complaint
is hereby dismissed because it is frivolous, fails to state a claim
on which relief may be granted, and seeks monetary relief against
a

defendant

who

is

immune

from

suit.

This

case

is

hereby

dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE