Hays v. Williams Law Firm, The et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis but Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed because it is frivolous, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from suit. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 27, 2012. (tg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
STEVEN J. HAYS
Civil No. 12-5034
THE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM;
THE MUNICIPALITY OF GENTRY, ARKANSAS;
and THE MUNICIPALITY OF HIGHFILL, ARKANSAS
O R D E R
NOW on this 27th day of March 2012, comes on for consideration
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4), filed on
February 29, 2012, to which no objections have been filed.
Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds it sound
in all respects and finds that it should be adopted in toto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 4) is hereby adopted in toto;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion to
Proceed IFP (Doc. 4) is hereby granted, but Plaintiff’s Complaint
is hereby dismissed because it is frivolous, fails to state a claim
on which relief may be granted, and seeks monetary relief against
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?