Ward v. Long

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and finding as moot 43 Motion for Order; granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. (CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE)Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on June 24, 2013. (tg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER WARD

PLAINTIFF

v.

Civil No. 12-5096

MICHAEL LONG

DEFENDANT
O R D E R

Now on this 24th day of June 2013, comes on for consideration
the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document
#41) and plaintiff's objections thereto. The Court has reviewed
the Report and Recommendation and, being well and sufficiently
advised,

finds

plaintiff

has

that
stated

it

is

sound

neither

in

law

all

nor

respects,
fact

to

and

refute

that
the

Recommendation.
Also before the Court is a letter from plaintiff (document
#43) seeking additional legal resources and more time to study
them. In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that these
requests are moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge (document #41) is hereby adopted in toto, and
plaintiff's objections are overruled;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Report and Recommendation, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
(document
prejudice.

#29)

is

granted,

and

this

case

is

dismissed

with

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent plaintiff's letter
(document #43) can be construed as a motion, it is hereby denied
as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-