Ramthun et al v. Bryan Career College - Incorporated et al

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 31 Motion to Continue. The case is moved from the previous trial setting of 6/23/2014. After resolution of the class-certification issue, the Court will schedule a status conference to address the stayed deadlines and trial date. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on November 14, 2013. (tg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION TRACY RAMTHUN and ANGELA CLEMENS PLAINTIFFS v. Civil No. 13-5039 BRYAN CAREER COLLEGE, INC. d/b/a Bryan College and Bryan University DEFENDANT O R D E R Now on this 14th day of November 2013, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (document #37), to which the parties have waived their right to file objections. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that it is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (document #37) is adopted in toto. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion for Continuance and Extension of Scheduling Order Deadlines (document #31) is granted to the following extent: * The deadline for filing a motion for class certification is extended to February 17, 2014. * The other deadlines and the trial date set out in the Final Scheduling Order are hereby stayed pending the Court's ruling on the anticipated motion for class certification. In the meantime, counsel are expected to make all efforts to complete any discovery that does not hinge upon the issue of class certification. After resolution of the class-certification issue, the Court will schedule a status conference to address the stayed deadlines and trial date. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?