Jackson v. Storey et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and REFERRING CASE to Honorable James R. Marschewski. John Threet, Bobby Boyd and William Storey are Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 26, 2014. (src)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
STACY ORLANDO JACKSON
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:13-CV-05221
CIRCUIT JUDGE WILLIAM STOREY; SHERIFF
TIM HELDER; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY JOHN
THREET; BOBBY BOYD, Deputy Clerk; CAPTAIN
LIVERMORE; SERGEANT T. MUGGY, Washington
County Detention Center; DETECTIVE R. KNOTTS,
Fayetteville Police Department; SERGEANT ARNOLD,
Washington County Detention Center
DEFENDANTS
OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 14) by Chief United States
Magistrate Judge James R. Marschewski. Also before the Court are Plaintiff Stacy Orlando
Jackson’s objections (Doc. 15).
The Magistrate recommends dismissal of this action on the grounds that the claims are
frivolous, fail to state claims on which relief may be granted, and seek relief against defendants who
are immune from suit. In his objections, Jackson concedes that Defendants Storey, Threet, and Boyd
are immune from suit and asks the Court to dismiss them. Jackson then seeks to amend his
complaint as to Defendants Sheriff Tim Helder, Captain Livermore, Detective Knotts, and Sergeant
Arnold.
The Court finds that the Magistrate’s report and recommendation should be adopted in part
insofar as it recommends dismissal of Defendants Storey and Threet based on their immunity from
suit. While the report does not specifically address Defendant Boyd, Jackson has agreed that Boyd
should likewise be dismissed as immune from suit, and the Court finds that dismissal is appropriate,
as Jackson appears to allege that Boyd was acting at the direction of Judge Storey. Geitz v. Overall,
-1-
62 Fed. Appx. 744, 746 (8th Cir. 2003) (unpublished) (court clerks have absolute immunity “for acts
that may be seen as discretionary, or for acts taken at the direction of a judge or according to court
rule”).
The Court declines to adopt, however, the report and recommendation to the extent that it
recommends dismissal of the remaining Defendants. While the report quotes at length from Baker
v. McCollan1 and then concludes that “no claim is stated” by Jackson, the report is not clear as to
which Defendants the quoted passage pertains. The report does not explain how the quoted passage
justifies dismissal of all of the remaining defendants—Helder, Livermore, Arnold, and Knotts—who
are not otherwise explicitly addressed in the report’s analysis. Especially in light of the fact that
Jackson now requests permission to amend his complaint (the Court takes no stance in this opinion
as to whether allowing amendment would be appropriate), the Court recommits this matter to the
Magistrate for further analysis as to Defendants Helder, Livermore, Arnold, and Knotts, as well as
consideration of Jackson’s pending request to amend his complaint. If the Magistrate does not
recommend dismissal of all federal claims after such additional analysis, it is also requested that the
Magistrate consider whether Jackson has stated a claim under state law for defamation and, if so,
whether the claim may or should be considered by this Court pursuant to the Court’s ability to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a state-law claim.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Magistrate (Doc.
14) is ADOPTED IN PART as set forth above.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Storey, Threet, and Boyd are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE from this action as immune from suit and as requested by Plaintiff.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be recommitted to the Magistrate for further
1
443 U.S. 137 (1979).
-2-
consideration and analysis of the claims against Defendants Helder, Livermore, Arnold, and Knotts
and Plaintiff’s defamation claim, as well as consideration of Plaintiff’s pending request (Doc. 15)
to amend his complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2014.
s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?