Chaney v. Cradduck et al
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Kelley Cradduck, Devore, J. Martinez, Catering by Marlins and Cogdill dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on August 17, 2016. (tg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
JAMES W. CHANEY, JR.
v.
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-5352
SHERIFF KELLEY CRADDUCK; SERGEANT COGDILL;
LIEUTENANT J. MARTINEZ; LIEUTENANT DEVORE;
DR. ROBERTO SAEZ, Southern Health Partners;
NURSE AMBER GOFF, Southern Health Partners;
JOHN DOE DEPUTY; CATERING BY MARLINS d/b/a
CBM MANAGED SERVICES; and NURSE TYRANNY RAY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 61) filed in this
case on July 19, 2016 , by the Honorable Mark E. Ford , United States Magistrate Judge
for the Western District of Arkansas . Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections
being filed by the parties .
The Court has reviewed this case and , being well and sufficiently advised, finds as
follows : the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is
ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Specifically, (1) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
56) filed by the Benton County Defendants , Sheriff Cradduck, Sergeant Cogdill, Lieutenant
Martinez, and Lieutenant Devore is GRANTED and the claims against them DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE ; (2) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53) filed by the Medical
Defendants, Dr. Roberto Saez, Nurse Amber Goff, and Nurse Tyranny Ray, is DENIED ;
and , (3) the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 50) filed by Catering by Marlins (CBM)
is GRANTED and the claims against it DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This leaves for later resolution t~laims agai
IT IS SO ORDERED on this
I
day of
2
t the Medical Defendants.
g st, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?