Ponder v. Cradduck et al

Filing 56

ORDER ADOPTING 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting in part and denying in part 36 & 39 Motions for Summary Judgment. See order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on July 26, 2016. (tg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION PLAINTIFF ERIC PONDER v. CASE NO. 5:15-CV-5022 SHERIFF KELLY CRADDUCK; CATERING BY MARLINS; CAROLYN ELLIS; SERGEANT SHARP; and SERGEANT COGDILL DEFENDANTS ORDER Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53) filed in this case on June 14, 2016 , by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge forthe Western District of Arkansas . Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and , being well and sufficiently advised , finds as follows : the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation , (1) the Summary Judgment Motion filed by the Benton County Defendants (Doc. 36) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, it should be granted with respect to all claims against Sergeant Cogbill and all individual capacity claims against Sheriff Cradduck and Sergeant Sharp . The official capacity claims against Sheriff Cradduck and Sergeant Sharp remain for later resolution ; and , (2) the Summary Judgment Motion filed by CBM (Doc. 39) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, all individual liability claims should be dismissed. The official capacity claims remain for later IT IS SO ORDERED on this M r~lution. day of ul 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?