Stover v. Moist et al
ORDER adopting 93 IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants motions for summary judgment Docs. 72 and 76 are GRANTED; and this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants motion for use of county law library Doc. 90 is MOOT. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 10, 2017. (rg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER MOIST,
4th Judicial District Drug Task Force (DTF);
DETECTIVE CAMERON CRAFTON, DTF;
DETECTIVE THORSON, DTF; and
DETECTIVE REX ALAN FREDRICK
Currently before the Court is the report and recommendation (Doc. 93) of United States
Magistrate Judge Erin L. Setser. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Calvin Stover’s objections
(Doc. 94) to the report and recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review as to all
proposed findings and recommendations to which Plaintiff has raised objections. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(c). Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither
law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and recommendations and that the
Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error.
The Magistrate’s report (Doc.93) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motions for
summary judgment (Docs. 72 and 76) are GRANTED; and this matter is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. Defendant’s motion for use of county law library (Doc. 90) is MOOT.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2017.
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?