Cruz v. Lindsay et al
ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2016. (rg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 5:16-CV-05229
JUDGE MARK LINDSAY,
PROSECUTOR MATT DURRETT,
PROSECUTOR SHANE KERR,
PUBLIC DEFENDER DANIEL R. FIELD, and
PROBATION OFFICER MORRIS
Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 6) of the Honorable
James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before
the Court are Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 8). Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s
objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and
recommendations and that the Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error.
The Magistrate’s report (Doc. 6) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly,
for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2016A
/s/P. K. Holmes, III
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?