Cruz v. Lindsay et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2016. (rg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION ALFONSO CRUZ v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:16-CV-05229 JUDGE MARK LINDSAY, PROSECUTOR MATT DURRETT, PROSECUTOR SHANE KERR, PUBLIC DEFENDER DANIEL R. FIELD, and PROBATION OFFICER MORRIS DEFENDANTS ORDER Currently before the Court are the findings and recommendations (Doc. 6) of the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s objection (Doc. 8). Upon due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate’s findings and recommendations and that the Magistrate’s report does not otherwise contain any clear error. The Magistrate’s report (Doc. 6) is therefore ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the report, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2016A /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?