Carter v. Tucker
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to follow the rules of the Court. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 16, 2017. (rg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
DILLON CARL CARTER
v.
Civil No. 5:17-CV-5047
DEPUTY NATE TUCKER,
Benton County Detention Center
DEFENDANT
OPINION AND ORDER
This is a civil rights case filed by the Plaintiff under the provisions of 42 U.S.C.
ยง 1983. Plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis and prose. At the times at issue in this case,
Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Benton County Detention Center.
To date, all mail sent by the Court to Plaintiff at the Benton County Detention Center
has been returned as undeliverable (Doc. 6, 7) with a notation that he is no longer at that
facility. Documents returned as undeliverable include: Complaint Referred (Doc. 1);
Application to Proceed IFP (Doc. 2) ; Order Granting IFP and Directing Prisoner Payment
(Doc. 3); Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished (Doc. 4) ; and Clerk's Order re PLRA Initial
Fee (Doc. 5). No new address is available for Plaintiff.
Rule 5.5 (c)(2) of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
requires a pro se party to keep the Court and opposing counsel informed of his current
address. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to follow the rules of the Court.
Fed . R. Civ. P 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED on this
I
t {~
' day of May, 20 7.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?