Yeakley v. Karas et al

Filing 6

OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) and dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to collect the $350.00 filing fee from the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 5, 2018. (rg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION TYLER WAYNE YEAKLEY v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 5:17-cv-05259 DR. ROBERT KARAS; and ALL MEDICAL STAFF DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. He proceeds pro se and has submitted an application (ECF No. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). When he filed this case on December 13, 2017, Plaintiff was directed (ECF No. 3) to file an amended complaint by December 29, 2017. Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Order of the Court would subject the case to dismissal. To date, Plaintiff has not filed the amended complaint. No mail has been returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not requested an extension of time to file the amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on the Plaintiff’s failure to obey the Order of the Court and his failure to prosecute this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Despite the dismissal of the Complaint, the Plaintiff remains liable for the $350 filing fee under the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 1997)(“PLRA makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal”). The IFP application (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. However, the Clerk is directed to collect the $350 filing fee from the Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 5th day of January 2018. /s/P.K. Holmes,III P. K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?