Gelabert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Filing
6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; granting #3 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration Commissioner. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on June 4, 2021. (lgd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
KELLY GELABERT
v.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL NO. 21-5101
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner
Social Security Administration
DEFENDANT
ORDER
On June 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) seeking judicial
review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Doc. 2).
Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on the same date. (Doc. 3).
After review, it is found that Plaintiff is unable to pay for the costs of commencement of suit and,
accordingly, the following order is entered this 4th day of June 2021:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is granted. The Court hereby directs that a copy of the complaint, along with a copy of this order,
be served by the Plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt requested, on the Defendant, Andrew M.
Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, as well as, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.
Attorney General, and Candace Taylor, Assistant U.S. Attorney. The Defendant is ordered to
answer within sixty (60) days from the date of service.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Christy Comstock
/s/
HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?