Jackson v. Walmart Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendations. Upon preservice screening, the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 16, 2024. (bjb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
RODERICK JACKSON
V.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:24-CV-5013

WALMART, INC.

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 12) of
the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas. Fourteen days have now passed, and no objections were filed in
response to the R&R
Being sufficiently advised, the Court finds the R&R is proper and is hereby
ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, upon preservice screening, the Amended
Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and
for lack of jurisdiction. To the extent any state law claims are also stated, the Court
DECLINES TO EXERCISE supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 16th day of April, 2024.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE