Bryant v. Sanders et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto 27 and granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Chris Hoar, Larry Sanders, Scott Kelsnuner, Dewayne Horner, Deputy Shirley, Tommy Harmon, Deputy Hedrick, Mel Steed, David Avant, Kevin Hale, ***Civil Case dismissed and Terminated. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 4, 2008. (sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E ST E RN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS H O T SPRINGS DIVISION S T AC Y PAUL BRYANT v. C i vi l No. 6:07-CV-06031 P L AI N TI F F L A RR Y SANDERS, Sheriff, Garland C o un t y, Arkansas; MEL STEED, Captain, G a rl a nd County Detention Center; CPL. C H RI S HOAR, Place of Employment Unknown; D A VI D AVANT, Deputy, Garland County D e te n ti o n Center; DEWAYNE HORNER, D e pu t y, Garland County Detention Center; D E PU T Y HEDRICK (#308), Garland County D e te n ti o n Center; SCOTT KELSNUNER, D e pu t y, Garland County Detention Center; D E PU T Y SHIRLEY, Garland County Detention C e nt e r; DR. KEVIN HALE; NURSE TOMMY HARMON, Garland County Detention Center ORDER Now on this 4th day of September, 2008, D E FE N DA N T comes on for c o ns i de r at i on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, H o n. Barry A. Bryant (document #27, filed July 30, 2008), in this m a tt e r, to which no objections have been filed, and the Court, h a vi n g carefully reviewed said Report and Recommendation, finds that i t is sound in all respects, and that it should be adopted in toto. I T IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and R e co m me n da t io n is adopted in toto. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the M a gi s tr a te Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendants' Motion for S u mm a ry Judgment (doc. #22) is hereby granted and this case is d i sm i ss e d. IT IS SO ORDERED. / s /J i mm Larry Hendren H O N. JIMM LARRY HENDREN U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?