Lewis v. Thomason et al

Filing 118

JUDGMENT in favor of Brandon Thomason against Sandria Lewis. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 5, 2009. (dmc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION

SANDRIA LEWIS as Administratrix of the Estate of KENNETH BROWN, deceased v. BRANDON THOMASON JUDGMENT CASE NO. 07-6033

PLAINTIFF

DEFENDANTS

On the 2nd day of March 2009, this matter came on for trial to a duly selected jury consisting of eight members, the Honorable Robert T. Dawson presiding. On March 4, 2009, the case was

submitted to the jury on interrogatories and a unanimous verdict was reached as to each interrogatory as follows:

INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Complete the following paragraph by writing in the name required by your verdict. On plaintiff's claim of excessive force as submitted in instruction 9, we find in favor of:

________________________ Plaintiff Sandria Lewis

Brandon Thomason Defendant Brandon Thomason

INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Complete the following paragraph by writing in the name required by your verdict. On Plaintiff's claim for assault as described in instructions 10, we find for?

________________________ Plaintiff Sandria Lewis

Brandon Thomason Defendant Brandon Thomason

INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Complete the following paragraph by writing in the name required by your verdict. On Plaintiff's claim for battery as described in instructions 11, we find for

________________________ Plaintiff Sandria Lewis

Brandon Thomason Defendant Brandon Thomason

INTERROGATORY NO. 4: If you found in favor of Plaintiff Sandria Lewis in Interrogatory No. 1, 2 or 3, then answer this

Interrogatory: State the amount of damages which you find from a

preponderance of the evidence were sustained by Sandria Lewis, as administratrix of the estate of Kenneth Brown, deceased, as a result of the conduct of Brandon Thomason as described in

Instructions 13 and 14.

COMPENSATORY DAMAGES $ None

INTERROGATORY NO. 5: If you found in favor of Plaintiff Sandria Lewis in Interrogatory No. 1, then answer this Interrogatory: State the amount of punitive damages, as submitted in

Instructions 15, that you find should be awarded to Plaintiff Sandria Lewis; if none, write the word none. PUNITIVE DAMAGES $ None

INTERROGATORY NO. 6: If you found in favor of Plaintiff Sandria Lewis in Interrogatory No. 2 or 3, then answer this Interrogatory: State the amount of punitive damages, as submitted in

Instruction No. 16, that you find should be awarded to Plaintiff Sandria Lewis; if none, write the word none. PUNITIVE DAMAGES $ None

IT

IS

ORDERED

AND

ADJUDGED

in

accordance

with

the jury

verdict, as well as this Court's determination, that the Plaintiff takes nothing on her complaint and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties are to bear their respective costs and

attorney's fees. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of March, 2009.

/s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge