Blevins v. Larry Sanders, et al
JUDGMENT dismissing case based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and his failure to keep the court and opposing counsel informed of his current address. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 15, 2009. (dmc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WE S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS H O T SPRINGS DIVISION C O R E Y LAMONT BLEVINS v. C iv il No. 6:08-cv-06036 PLAINTIFF
LARRY SANDERS, Sheriff, Garland County, Arkansas; and CAPTAIN M E L STEED, JAIL ADMINISTRATOR, G a rlan d County Detention Facility JUDGM ENT
D E FE N D A N T S
O n March 9, 2009, an order was entered continuing the bench trial scheduled for March 24, 20 09 (Doc. 26). The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for Plaintiff was cancelled. An order w as also entered (Doc. 27) directing the Plaintiff to complete, sign, and return an attached response to th e Defendants' summary judgment motion. Plaintiff was directed to file his response by April 6, 2009. O n March 24, 2009, all mail sent to the Plaintiff on March 9, 2009, was returned as un deliverable with a notation that Plaintiff was no longer at the Varner Unit of the Arkansas D e partm e nt of Correction. A search of the website maintained by the Arkansas Department of C orrection indicates no records under Plaintiff's name or prisoner number. It appears Plaintiff has been released from the Arkansas Department of Correction. Plaintiff has not provided the court with his new address or otherwise communicated with the co u rt. This case is hereby dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action and his failure to keep the court and opposing counsel informed of his current address. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 5 .5 (c)(2 ) of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of April 2009.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?