Harris v. Bethall et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations.The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims a re frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, or fail to state claims on which reliefcan be granted. 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles P Harris, Motions terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 6, 2008. (dmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CHARLES P. HARRIS v. Case No. 08-6052 PLAINTIFF ROY BETHELL, Criminal Investigator, Arkadelphia Police Department; HARLEY HILLARY, Sergeant, Arkadelphia Police Department; JOHN THOMPSON, Judge, Clark County; and HENRY MORGAN, Former Prosecutor, Clark County DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 6th day of October 2008, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July 1, 2008, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 10). The Court granted Plaintiff an extension through August 4, 2008, to file written objections to the report and recommendation. date, no objections have been filed. The court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and As of this sufficiently advised, follows: report recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, or fail to state claims on which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii)(IFP action AO72A (Rev. 8/82) may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?