Ickstadt v. Progressive Insurance Company
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, and 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jack Ickstadt be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 4/24/2009. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 7, 2009. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
H O T SPRINGS DIVISION
JA M E S ICKSTADT v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY C iv il No. 6:08-cv-06068
D E FE N D A N T
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff, James Ickstadt (hereinafter Plaintiff), proceeds in this action in forma pauperis and pro se. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3)(2007), the Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge, referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a report and recommendation. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss this action (Doc. 12). Attached to the motion is a release signed by the Plaintiff on December 16, 2008. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) this action with prejudice. I therefore recommend that the motions to dismiss (Doc. 12 and Doc. 13) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. The parties have ten days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. DATED this 7th day of April 2009. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?