Cody v. Clark County Sheriff Department et al

Filing 110

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety re 109 Report and Recommendations re 109 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 30, 2012. (dmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION STEPHEN DONNELLE CODY v. PLAINTIFF No. 09-6016 MS. JACUELINE NEWBURN, Jail Administrator; Clark County Detention Center; TIM PATTERSON, Chief Deputy; RICK LOY, Interim Jail Administrator; Clark County Detention Center; and DAVID TURNER, Sheriff, Clark County DEFENDANTS AND STEVEN D. CODY PLAINTIFF v. No. 09-6026 JAQUEINE NEWBORN, Jail Administrator, Clark County Detention Center, TIM PATTERSON, Chief Deputy, Clark County Detention Center; RICK LOY, Jail Administrator, Clark County Detention Center; DAVID TURNER, Sheriff, Clark County; and OFFICER MOORE DEFENDANTS AND STEPHEN CODY PLAINTIFF v. No. 10-6014 RICK LOY, Jail Administrator; RAY WINSFIELD, Chief Deputy; RAYMOND MOORE, Jailer DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 30th day of March 2012, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in these consolidated cases on February 29, 2012, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of AO72A (Rev. 8/82) Arkansas. (Doc. 109). An evidentiary hearing was held on February 15, 2012, and the parties have not filed written objections to the report and recommendation. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, and these cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?