Cody v. Clark County Sheriff Department et al
Filing
110
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety re 109 Report and Recommendations re 109 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 30, 2012. (dmc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
STEPHEN DONNELLE CODY
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 09-6016
MS. JACUELINE NEWBURN, Jail
Administrator; Clark County
Detention Center; TIM PATTERSON,
Chief Deputy; RICK LOY, Interim
Jail Administrator; Clark County
Detention Center; and DAVID TURNER,
Sheriff, Clark County
DEFENDANTS
AND
STEVEN D. CODY
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 09-6026
JAQUEINE NEWBORN, Jail
Administrator, Clark County
Detention Center, TIM PATTERSON,
Chief Deputy, Clark County
Detention Center; RICK LOY,
Jail Administrator, Clark
County Detention Center; DAVID
TURNER, Sheriff, Clark County;
and OFFICER MOORE
DEFENDANTS
AND
STEPHEN CODY
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 10-6014
RICK LOY, Jail Administrator;
RAY WINSFIELD, Chief Deputy;
RAYMOND MOORE, Jailer
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 30th day of March 2012, there comes on for
consideration
the
report
and
recommendation
filed
in
these
consolidated cases on February 29, 2012, by the Honorable Barry A.
Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Arkansas. (Doc. 109). An evidentiary hearing was held on February
15, 2012, and the parties have not filed written objections to the
report and recommendation.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants,
and these cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?