Arch Wood Protection, Inc. et al v. Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc. et al

Filing 24

JUDGMENT in favor of Arch Treatment Technologies, Inc. and Arch Wood Protection, Inc. against each separate Defendant Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc., Curt Bean, and Tim Bean, as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 28, 2010. (lw)

Arch Wood Protection, Inc. et al v. Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc. et al

Doc. 24

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION ARCH WOOD PROTECTIONS, INC. and ARCH TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Civil No. 09-6023 DEFENDANTS

PLAINTIFFS

CURT BEAN LUMBER CO., INC., et al. JUDGMENT

Currently before the Court is the above-styled cause. On June 22, 2009, the Court granted the parties' joint motion to administratively judgments entered terminate into by the case based Curt upon Bean consent Lumber

Plaintiffs,

Company, Curt Bean and Tim Bean. On July 27, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a motion to reopen the case to enforce the settlement which was granted on August 18, 2010 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant. Defendants did not respond to Plaintiffs' Motion.

The Court has reviewed the consent judgments between Plaintiffs and Curt Bean Lumber Company, Curt Bean and Tim Bean (doc. 21, exhibits 1-3). As Curt Bean Lumber Company,

Curt Bean and Tim Bean have not complied with the terms of the consent judgments, the Court finds that judgment should be and is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against each Separate Defendant; Curt Bean Lumber Company, Curt Bean and Tim Bean, in the amount of $778,991.20 plus pre-judgment interest on the principal balance of $763,320.37 at 6% annum from April 2, 2009 to September 27, 2010, and interest from

AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Dockets.Justia.com

the date of this judgment until paid at the current postjudgment interest rate of .25% per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September 2010. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge

2

AO72A (Rev. 8/82)