Cody v. Newborn et al

Filing 77

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Officer Moore, Jaqueine Newborn, Rick Loy, Tim Patterson, David Turner; Granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Sum mary Judgment. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs failure to protect claims, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs unconstitutional conditions of confinement claims. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 19, 2011. (dmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION STEVEN D. CODY PLAINTIFF v. No. 09-6026 JAQUEINE NEWBORN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 19th day of September 2011, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on August 25, 2011, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. States (Doc. 71). Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s written objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 74). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 56) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s failure to protect claims, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s unconstitutional conditions of confinement claims. The issue of whether this case should be consolidated with Plaintiff’s two other pending cases will be addressed in a separate order. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?