Sanders v. Langley et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety for 10 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED forfailure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered a strike for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Finally, the U.S. District Clerk is directed to collect the $350.00 filing fee from Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 29, 2010. (dmc)

Sanders v. Langley et al

Doc. 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION JEREMY SANDERS v. JAMES LANGLEY, et al. ORDER Now on this 29th day of September 2010, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on Case No. 09-6028 DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

September 7, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Plaintiff did not file timely, written objections. The court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and (Doc. 10).

sufficiently

advised,

follows:

report

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for See 28 U.S.C. §

failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered 28

a "strike" for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Finally, the U.S. District Clerk is directed to

collect the $350.00 filing fee from Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge

AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Dockets.Justia.com