Carthron v. Morrison et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying 22 Motion for New Trial (construed as a motion to reconsider ruling). Plaintiff is again advised that he has thirty days from the entry of the judgment to appeal. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 1, 2009. (dmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION JOSEPH CARTHRON v. Case. No. 09-6036 PLAINTIFF HELEN MARIE MORRISON, ANNE KATHLEEN GEDDINGS, BECKY CAROL REEVES, ANITA EFIRD, and DAN ROBERTS ORDER DEFENDANTS Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for a New Trial or Amendment of Judgment (Doc. 22). On September 14, 2009, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 21). The Court will construe Such Plaintiff's Motion as a motion to reconsider its ruling. motion is DENIED, and Plaintiff is again advised that he has thirty days from the entry of the judgment to appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of October 2009. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?