Philson v. Arkadelphia Human Development Center et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case and 21 Second MOTION to Dismiss filed by Cindy Nash, Marilyn Nasbaun, Vicky Sun, Rebecca Riggles, Mandy Pierce, Sharon Mohammed, Charlene Miller, Beverly Willis, Witt Brown, Marg o Green, Julie Wilhelms, Phyllis Hankins; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 in it's intirety. Separate Defendants Sharon Mohammed, Rebecca Riggles, Margo Green, Charlene Miller, Julie Wilhelms, Mandy Pierce, Vicky Sun, Marilyn Nusbaum, Cindy Nash, Witt Brown, Phyllis Hankins, and Beverly Willis are DISMISSED as Defendants in this matter. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 9, 2009. (dmc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION MICHAEL PHILSON V. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ORDER Now on this 9th day of November 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on October 20, 2009, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States CASE NO. 09CV6053 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
The parties did not file any written objections to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) and
Second Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Separate Defendants Sharon Mohammed, Rebecca Riggles,
Margo Green, Charlene Miller, Julie Wilhelms, Mandy Pierce, Vicky Sun, Marilyn Nusbaum, Cindy Nash, Witt Brown, Phyllis Hankins, and Beverly Willis are DISMISSED as Defendants in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?