Shaw v. Donahue

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety 3 Report and Recommendations, re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Eric Shaw; Denying 2 Plaintiff's request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Civil Case terminated. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 10, 2009. (dmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION ERIC SHAW v. BRENDAN DONAHUE, Prosecuting Attorney ORDER Now on this 10th day of December 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on Case No. 09-6113 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT November 24, 2009, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 3). Also before the Court are Plaintiff's written objections (Doc. 4). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against an individual who is immune from suit, and/or fail to state claims on which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)- (iii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal is considered a "strike" for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 1915(g). 28 U.S.C. § AO72A (Rev. 8/82) IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?