Meller v. Meller Management, LLC et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting 69 Motion to Quash; granting 71 Motion to Quash; granting 73 Motion to Quash. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 21, 2011. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION STEPHEN A. MELLER, TRUSTEE OF STEPHEN A. MELLER TRUST AND STEPHEN A. MELLER DECENDENTS SEPARATE TRUST vs. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 6:10-cv-06018 MELLER MANAGEMENT, LLC, SALLY W. MELLER, L.P., and COMMUNITY FIRST TRUST COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER BEFORE the Court is the Separate Defendants, Meller Management, LLC and Sally W. Meller, L.P., Motion to Quash Deposition of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten (ECF. No. 69), Separate Defendants, Meller Management, LLC and Sally W. Meller, L.P., Motion to Quash Deposition of a Representative of Meller Management, LLC., (ECF No. 71), and Defendant Community First Trust Company's Motion to Quash Deposition of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten. ECF No. 73. Plaintiff has responded to these Motions. ECF. No. 74. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Robert T. Dawson referred these Motions to Quash to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and arguments of counsel finds these Motions to Quash should be GRANTED. 1. Background: On January 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Continue Trial and Discovery Deadline. ECF No. 28. On January 13, 2011 this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Trial and -1- Discovery Deadline and extended the discovery deadline through March 21, 2011. ECF No. 33. By text order dated January 13, 2011, this matter has been set for trial for June 13, 2011. On March 11, 2011 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and requested a thirty (30) day extension of the discovery deadline, through and including April 20, 2011, for the sole purpose of deposing Carol Sue “Suzi” Meller. ECF No. 55. On April 4, 2011, this Court, by text order, granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery which provided Plaintiff a thirty (30) day extension of the discovery deadline, through and including April 20, 2011, for the sole purpose of deposing Carol Sue “Suzi” Meller. On April 12, 2011, Plaintiff noticed the deposition of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten and a Representative of Meller Management, LLC, to be taken April 26, 2011. ECF No. 69-1, 71-1. With these Motions To Quash, the Defendants seek to prevent Plaintiff from taking these depositions on April 26, 2011 as this date is outside the extended discovery deadline, April 20, 2011. ECF Nos. 69, 71, and 73. 2. Discussion: Plaintiff's seek to take the depositions of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten and a Representative of Meller Management LLC on April 26, 2011. These depositions are beyond the scope of the discovery deadline as set forth by this Court in its text entry order of April 4, 2011. By this order, Plaintiff was granted a thirty (30) day extension of the discovery deadline, through and including April 20, 2011, for the sole purpose of deposing Carol Sue “Suzi” Meller. The Court did not authorize discovery beyond April 20, 2011, and did not authorize additional depositions other than that of Carol Sue “Suzi” Meller. -2- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Separate Defendants, Meller Management, LLC and Sally W. Meller, L.P., Motion to Quash Deposition of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten (ECF. No. 69), Separate Defendants, Meller Management, LLC and Sally W. Meller, L.P., Motion to Quash Deposition of a Representative of Meller Management, LLC., (ECF No. 71), and Defendant Community First Trust Company's Motion to Quash Deposition of Carol Sue "Suzi" Meller-Hooten (ECF No. 73) are hereby GRANTED. DATED this 21st day of April, 2011. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?