Cody v. Erma et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on April 5, 2012. (dmc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
STEPHEN CODY
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 10-6070
MS. MARGARET, Probation and
Parole Office; AND MS. RHONDA
WARE, Probation and Parole Office
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 5th day of April, 2012, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on March
12, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 19).
Plaintiff has not filed timely, written objections.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s
IFP status (doc. 16) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s right to re-open it with payment
of the appropriate filing fee.
538, 540 (E.D. Mich. 1997).
See Witzke v. Hiller, 966 F.Supp.
In the event Plaintiff tenders the
filing fee, he will also be responsible for other costs associated
with this action, such as costs of service and subpoena fees.
Plaintiff is precluded from filing any future civil action IFP
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Accordingly,
the
U.S.
District
Clerk
is
directed
to
provisionally file any new action in which Steven Cody seeks to
proceed IFP.
The U.S. Magistrate Judge shall then review the
action and, if it is a civil action, rather than a criminal or
habeas one, and, if Cody has not asserted a valid claim that he is
under imminent danger of serious physical injury, the magistrate
judge shall recommend that IFP status be denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?