-BAB Clayton v. Williams et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Clayton; Denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Larry Clayton; finding as moot [6 ] Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Larry Clayton. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit,fail to state claims on which relief can be granted or are not presently cognizable. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 6, 2010. (dmc)
Clayton v. Williams et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION LARRY CLAYTON v. Case No. 10-6073 PLAINTIFF
CIRCUIT JUDGE CHRIS WILLIAMS; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY RICHARD GARRETT; PUBLIC DEFENDER GREGORY CRAIN; PAROLE OFFICER CASSANDRA ROWLUND; OFFICER JAGAIRAN CROSS; OFFICER ROWE and OFFICER LINGO
ORDER Now on this 6th day of December 2010, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on
November 8, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No objections have been filed. The court has reviewed finds this as case and, being The well and and (Doc. 9).
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED, and
his Complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, fail to state claims on which relief can be granted or are not presently cognizable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii)(IFP Plaintiff's
action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time).
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
motion seeking to amend his complaint (doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge
AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?