Teague et al v. Arkansas Board of Education et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT for reasons set forth in 98 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' 69 Motion for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief is granted in part and denied in part; Defendants' 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Intervenors' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on June 8, 2012. (cap)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RON AND KATHY TEAGUE, on and
behalf of minor children, T.T.
and S.T.; DARRIN AND JULIE HARDY,
on and behalf of minor child,
C.H.; RHONDA RICHARDSON on and
behalf of minor child A.R.;
MARK AND JENNIFER DRAPER on and
behalf of minor children, A.D. and S.D.,
v.

PLAINTIFFS

CASE NO. 10-6098

ARKANSAS BOARD OF EDUCATION;
JIM COOPER, BRENDA GULLETT,
SAMUEL LEDBETTER, ALICE
MAHONY, DR. BEN
MAYS, JOE BLACK, TOYCE NEWTON,
MIREYA REITH, AND VICKI SAVIERS,
in their official capacity;
MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT;
KAREN SCOTT, DANNY LINAM,
LISA LOFTIS, KIM BRAY, AND
JACK RYNDERS, in their
official capacity;
THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

DEFENDANTS

CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
NO. 16 OF OUACHITA COUNTY;
EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT #15,
UNION COUNTY, AR

INTERVENORS

JUDGMENT
For reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order,
filed

contemporaneously

herewith,

Plaintiffs’

Motion

for

Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Doc. 69) is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. 71) is DENIED.

Intervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. 74) is
PREJUDICE.

DENIED.

Plaintiffs’ claims are

DISMISSED WITH

Each party is to bear its own fees and costs.

The

parties have thirty days from entry of this judgment on the
docket in which to appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2012.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson________
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge