Teague et al v. Arkansas Board of Education et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT for reasons set forth in 98 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' 69 Motion for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief is granted in part and denied in part; Defendants' 71 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Intervenors' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on June 8, 2012. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION RON AND KATHY TEAGUE, on and behalf of minor children, T.T. and S.T.; DARRIN AND JULIE HARDY, on and behalf of minor child, C.H.; RHONDA RICHARDSON on and behalf of minor child A.R.; MARK AND JENNIFER DRAPER on and behalf of minor children, A.D. and S.D., v. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 10-6098 ARKANSAS BOARD OF EDUCATION; JIM COOPER, BRENDA GULLETT, SAMUEL LEDBETTER, ALICE MAHONY, DR. BEN MAYS, JOE BLACK, TOYCE NEWTON, MIREYA REITH, AND VICKI SAVIERS, in their official capacity; MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT; KAREN SCOTT, DANNY LINAM, LISA LOFTIS, KIM BRAY, AND JACK RYNDERS, in their official capacity; THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANTS CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16 OF OUACHITA COUNTY; EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT #15, UNION COUNTY, AR INTERVENORS JUDGMENT For reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed contemporaneously herewith, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Doc. 69) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 71) is DENIED. Intervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 74) is PREJUDICE. DENIED. Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED WITH Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. The parties have thirty days from entry of this judgment on the docket in which to appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2012. /s/ Robert T. Dawson________ Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?