Watkins v. Hobbs

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING 24 and 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 22 Motion for Default Judgment. Case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 28, 2012. (tg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION EDDIE S. WATKINS V. PETITIONER Civil No. 11-6005 RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER On this 28th day of November 2012, there comes on for consideration the reports and recommendations filed in this case on October 2, 2012 (doc. 23) and October 4, 2012 (doc. 24), by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. No objections were filed to either report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The reports and recommendations are proper and should be and hereby are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgment (doc. 22) is DENIED. Further, Petitioner’s Amended and Supplemental 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitions (docs. 12-13) are hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?