Cullen v. Garland County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
44
ORDER adopting 40 Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 14, 2013. (adw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
JOHN PATRICK CULLEN
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 11-6042
GARLAND COUNTY, ARKANSAS;
SHERIFF LARRY SANDERS;
CHIEF DEPUTY RAY SHOPTAW;
CAPTAIN MEL STEED and
LT. RONNIE RADLEY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 14th day of March 2013, there comes on for
consideration
the
report
and
recommendation
filed
herein
on
February 13, 2013, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United
States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 40).
Also before the Court are Defendants’ objections (doc.
43).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(doc. 16) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
Defendants’
motion is granted as to Plaintiff’s claims for (1) the lack of TB
lights; (2) the use of padlocks; (3) inadequacies in the grievance
procedure;
(4) failure
to
make
copies;
and
(5)
all official
capacity claims; and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint identifying the
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
individual involved and stating how he believes his constitutional
rights were violated if he intends to assert a retaliation claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?