Lacy v. Reed et al

Filing 49

ORDER ADOPTING 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Accordingly Defendant's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Separate Defendants Harris and May are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and Plaintiffs First Amendment claim regarding Smooth Magazine Issue#41 against Separate Defendants Reed and Campbell is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This leaves Plaintiffs First Amendment claim regarding issue #37 for future resolution. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 25, 2014. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION TREMAIN LACY PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 11-6053 DALE REED, LARRY MAY, GRANT HARRIS and FRED CAMPBELL DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 25th day of September 2014, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on August 11, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. States (Doc. 44). Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s written objections. (Doc. 46). The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 31) is GRANTED. Separate Defendants Harris and May are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim regarding Smooth Magazine Issue #41 against Separate Defendants Reed and Campbell is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This leaves Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim regarding issue #37 for future resolution. AO72A (Rev. 8/82) IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?