Ashlock v. Pike et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey the orders of the Court against Separate Defendant John Doe, Garland County Deputy Sheriff or Hot Springs Police Officer. The case will proceed against Separate Defendant Charles Pike. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 27, 2012. (dmc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
KEITH EDWARD ASHLOCK
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 11-6071
CHARLES PIKE, Bus ID No. 1598,
d/b/a AAA Transport & Auto Sales,
Hot Springs, Arkansas and JOHN DOE,
Garland County Deputy Sheriff or Hot
Springs Police Officer
DEFENDANTS
O R D E R
On this 27th day of February 2012, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case
on January 19, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski,
United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc.
8).
No
objections
were
filed
to
the
report
and
recommendation.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to
obey the orders of the Court against Separate Defendant John
Doe,
Garland
Officer.
County
Deputy
Sheriff
or
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
against Separate Defendant Charles Pike.
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Hot
Springs
Police
The case will proceed
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?