Percefull v. Barly et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, denying as moot 6 Motion to Supplement and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on June 25, 2013. (tg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
RICHARD PERCEFULL
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 11-6079

LIEUTENANT BAILY, Malvern Police Department;
RICHARD A. GARRETT, Chief Deputy Prosecuting
Attorney; GREGORY GRAIN, Public Defender;
SHERIFF CHAD LEDBETTER, Hot Springs County;
MAYOR NORTHCUT, Malvern, Arkansas; CHRIS
CLAGLAKER, Mayor, Camden, Arkansas; EDDY R.
EASLEY, Prosecuting Attorney, Malvern, Arkansas;
DEPUTY HALL, Malvern Police Department;
PHILLIP H. SHIRRON, Circuit Judge, Hot Springs
County; WILLIAM O’KEEF, Chief of Police, Camden
Arkansas; and DONNIE TALER, Chief of Police,
Malvern Arkansas

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Now on this 25th day of June 2013, there comes on for
consideration

the

report

and

recommendation

filed

herein

on

April 19, 2013, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
7).

(Doc.

Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s written objections.

(Doc. 8).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well
and sufficiently advised, finds as follows:

The report and

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s IFP motion (doc. 1) is

DENIED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 2) is DISMISSED WITH
Page 1 of 2

PREJUDICE on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, fail to
state claims upon which relief may be granted, or are asserted
against individuals who are immune from suit.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii)(IFP

action

grounds

Defendant’s

at

any

time).

may

be

See 28 U.S.C.

dismissed

Motion

to

on

such

Supplement

Complaint (doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge

Page 2 of 2