Murphy et al v. Ledbetter et al
ORDER adopting 59 Report and Recommendations in toto and granting defendants' 48 Motion for Summary Judgment as set forth Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 8, 2014. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
CASE NO. 11-CV-6091
SHERIFF CHAD LEDBETTER;
GEORGE WRIGHT; CORP. LINDA ROWE;
SGT. LINGO; AMY MARTIN; and
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 29, 2014, by the Honorable
James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF
No. 59. Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 48) be granted. Plaintiff has responded with objections, and the Court has reviewed the
objections. ECF Nos. 62 and 63. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that
Plaintiff’s objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and
After reviewing the record de novo, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in toto.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s official capacity claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims
regarding conditions of confinement, equal protection, and privacy are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims relating to the alleged sexual assault and harassment are
In her objections, Plaintiff states that “she has no other argument, or evidence at this time, thus, her objections are the
very same objections as she presented when she objected to Defendant’s Summary Judgment initially.” ECF No. 62,
p. 2. Plaintiff’s objections do not specifically reference any portion of the Report and Recommendation. In fact, Plaintiff
simply re-files her response to Defendants’ summary judgment motion as her objections to the Report and
Recommendation. ECF Nos. 53 and 63. The Report and Recommendation adequately addresses the arguments Plaintiff
makes in her response to the summary judgment motion.
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required
by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of September, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?