Jones v. Young
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting 11 Motion for Order and dismissing case without prejudice to inmate's right to refile upon payment of filing fee. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 16, 2013. (tg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
HOWARD JONES
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 12-6014
DREAM REDIC YOUNG
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now on this 16th day of January 2013, there comes on for
consideration
the
report
and
recommendation
filed
herein
on
November 29, 2012, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(Doc. 15).
Plaintiff did not file timely, written objections.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion (doc. 11) is GRANTED,
and Plaintiff’s IFP status is revoked pursuant to section 1915(g).
Further, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
Plaintiff’s right to re-open it with payment of the full $350.00
filing fee. See Witzke v. Hiller, 966 F.Supp. 538, 540 (E.D. Mich.
1997)(revoking IFP status under section 1915(g) and dismissing
action without prejudice to inmate’s right to refile upon payment
of filing fee).
Plaintiff is instructed to file a motion to reopen
the action upon payment to the United States District Clerk of the
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
proper filing fee.
Plaintiff is also advised that in the event he
tenders the filing fee, he will be responsible for any other costs
associated with this action, such as costs of service and fees for
the issuance of any requested subpoenas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?