Onstad v. Deputy Jack Naron, et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 re: claims (1)all official capacity claims; (2) all claims against Hill; (3) excessive force claim against Naron; and (4) deprivation of property claim. Further Sheriff Glenn is dismissed from this case . Defendant's summary judgment motion is denied as to Plaintiff's due process claim stemming from his time spent in segregation. Defendants are directed to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment with respect to the due process claim. Magistrate's Report and recommendations 50 are adopted in toto. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 45 is denied. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 8, 2014. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
ALAN COLE ONSTAD
vs.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 6:12-CV-6020
DEPUTY JACK NARON;
DEPUTY TRAVIS HILL; and
SHERIFF PRESTON “PEP” GLENN
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 15, 2014, by the Honorable
James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 50.
Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33) be
granted in part and denied in part. Further Judge Marschewski recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45) be denied.
No party has filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically,
Defendants’ motions should be granted as to the following claims: (1) all official capacity claims; (2) all
claims against Hill; (3) the excessive force claim against Naron; and (4) the deprivation of property claim.
Further, Sheriff Glenn is dismissed from this case. Defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied as
to Plaintiff’s due process claim stemming from his time spent in segregation. Defendants are directed to
file a supplemental motion for summary judgment with respect to the due process claim. Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 45) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of September, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?