Stephens v. Jessup et al

Filing 49

JUDGMENT granting 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. The section 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; remaining State Claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 11, 2016. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION DONALD STEPHENS v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 13-CV-6011 LESLIE JESSUP DEFENDANT JUDGMENT Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Leslie Jessup. ECF No. 38. Plaintiff Donald Stephens has responded. ECF. No. 44. Defendant has filed a reply. ECF No. 45. This matter is ripe for the Court’s consideration. For the reasons discussed in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court finds that Defendant Leslie Jessup’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) should be and hereby is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Donald Stephens’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The section 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state claims, and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, on this 11th day of July, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?