Sanders v. Hobbs et al

Filing 77

JUDGMENT granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's claims against defendants Hobbs, May, Holms and Walters WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND the claims against defendant Reed are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Order adopting the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations re 76 in toto. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 9, 2014. (sh) Modified to edit docket text on 9/9/2014 (sh).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION ROBERT LEE SANDERS VS. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 6:13-cv-6024 RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 11, 2014 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 76). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 63) be granted. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 63) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hobbs, Defendant May, Defendant Holms, and Defendant Walters are dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Reed are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of September, 2014. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?