Jones v. Reeves et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and dismissing case without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 12, 2013. (tg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION LINDSAY E. REHDERS JONES V. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 13-6038 MICHELLE REEVES, Nurse, Garland County Detention Center; DISPATCHER STACY SHIRLEY (or WILLINGHAM); MIKE MELACON, Assistant Case Worker Tuggle Clinic; MARK FRASIER, Public Defender; SERGEANT AINSLEE; and DEPUTY SEVERENS DEFENDANTS O R D E R On this 12th day of September 2013, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on August 22, 2013, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. 5). (Doc. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. Plaintiff was directed to submit an amended complaint (doc. 3). This order and a form to assist her was mailed to her at the address on file and was not returned to the Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not had any contact with the Court since the filing of her initial complaint on April 18, 2013. The copy of the report and recommendation sent to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable, however, Plaintiff never provided the Court with an updated address. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in AO72A (Rev. 8/82) its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, failure to obey the orders of this Court and/or failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?