Goodin v. Hot Springs Police Department et al

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; Hot Springs Police Department, Miller (Captain, Hot Springs Police Department), Jane Doe (Lt. Lisa, Hot Springs Police Department) and David Flory are dismissed. Claims against William Thorton and Lee Ann Clem remain. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 26, 2013. (src)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION JAMES GOODIN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 13-6050 HOT SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 26th day of September 2013, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July 19, 2013, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (doc. 12). Plaintiff’s copy of the report and recommendation was returned as undeliverable on July 30, 2013. On August 23, 2013, the Court directed the Clerk to change Plaintiff’s address and resend the report and recommendation (doc. 15). Plaintiff was directed to file any objections by September 9, 2013. Id. No objections were filed, and no mail was returned. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s official capacity claims; claims against the Hot Springs Police Department, Captain Miller, Jane Doe, and David Flory; and claims for slander are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii) and 1915A(a). The Hot Springs Police Department, Captain Miller, Jane Doe, and David Flory are DISMISSED from this action. AO72A (Rev. 8/82) Plaintiff’s individual capacity claims against Detectives William Thorton and Lee Ann Clem remain. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?