Gordon v. Ledbetter

Filing 28

ORDER denying 15 as to plaintiff's claims stemming from inaccuracies or falsification of transcripts in civil matters, and plaintiff is permitted to proceed with those claims, and Defendants motion to dismiss 15 is granted as to any claims a rising out of plaintiff's underlying state court conviction and sentence, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendations re 23 in its entirety. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 8, 2014. (sh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
PAUL M. GORDON

PLAINTIFF

v.

Case No. 13-6053

LECA LEDBETTER, Court
Reporter

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Now

on

this

8th

day

of

July

2014,

there

comes

on

for

consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on April
14,

2014,

by

the

Honorable

Barry

A.

Bryant,

United

Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

States

(Doc. 23).

Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections (doc. 25) and
Defendant’s Objections (doc. 26).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and
sufficiently

advised,

finds

as

follows:

The

report

and

recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 15) is

GRANTED as to any claims arising out of Plaintiff’s underlying
state court conviction and sentence, and those claims are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.

The motion (doc. 15) is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s

claims stemming from inaccuracies or falsification of transcripts
in the civil matters, and Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with
those claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)