Gordon v. Ledbetter
Filing
28
ORDER denying 15 as to plaintiff's claims stemming from inaccuracies or falsification of transcripts in civil matters, and plaintiff is permitted to proceed with those claims, and Defendants motion to dismiss 15 is granted as to any claims a rising out of plaintiff's underlying state court conviction and sentence, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendations re 23 in its entirety. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on July 8, 2014. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
PAUL M. GORDON
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 13-6053
LECA LEDBETTER, Court
Reporter
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now
on
this
8th
day
of
July
2014,
there
comes
on
for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on April
14,
2014,
by
the
Honorable
Barry
A.
Bryant,
United
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
States
(Doc. 23).
Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Objections (doc. 25) and
Defendant’s Objections (doc. 26).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 15) is
GRANTED as to any claims arising out of Plaintiff’s underlying
state court conviction and sentence, and those claims are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
The motion (doc. 15) is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s
claims stemming from inaccuracies or falsification of transcripts
in the civil matters, and Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with
those claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?