McAdoo v. Martin et al
ORDER that Defendants request for dismissal re 53 Satisfaction of Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 3, 2017. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
Case No. 6:13-cv-6088
SERGEANT AMY MARTIN and
OFFICER BEN CASH
Before the Court is Defendants’ Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment. (ECF No. 53). On
March 21, 2017, the Court entered a judgement in this case in favor of Plaintiff Daaron McAdoo
in the sum of $1.00 in nominal damages and $311.66 in costs, for a total judgment of $312.66, as
well as $38.34 representing the remainder of the case’s filing fee.
In the instant notice,
Defendants state that they have paid all amounts provided by the Court’s judgment, and thus the
judgment is satisfied. Thus, Defendants ask that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that
the Clerk of Court enter the satisfaction by marginal endorsement on behalf of the Defendants.
The Court notes that Defendants provided copies of the cashier’s checks and deposit slip
sent to Defendant via that Arkansas Department of Correction. In light of this, the Court finds
that Defendants have fully satisfied the Court’s March 21, 2017 judgment. However, the Court
finds no need to dismiss the case with prejudice because the case has already reached its
conclusion. For this reason, Defendants’ request for dismissal (ECF No. 53) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?