McAdoo v. Martin et al

Filing 54

ORDER that Defendants request for dismissal re 53 Satisfaction of Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 3, 2017. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION DAARON MCADOO v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 6:13-cv-6088 SERGEANT AMY MARTIN and OFFICER BEN CASH DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment. (ECF No. 53). On March 21, 2017, the Court entered a judgement in this case in favor of Plaintiff Daaron McAdoo in the sum of $1.00 in nominal damages and $311.66 in costs, for a total judgment of $312.66, as well as $38.34 representing the remainder of the case’s filing fee. In the instant notice, Defendants state that they have paid all amounts provided by the Court’s judgment, and thus the judgment is satisfied. Thus, Defendants ask that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Clerk of Court enter the satisfaction by marginal endorsement on behalf of the Defendants. The Court notes that Defendants provided copies of the cashier’s checks and deposit slip sent to Defendant via that Arkansas Department of Correction. In light of this, the Court finds that Defendants have fully satisfied the Court’s March 21, 2017 judgment. However, the Court finds no need to dismiss the case with prejudice because the case has already reached its conclusion. For this reason, Defendants’ request for dismissal (ECF No. 53) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2017. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?