Ford v. Greeley et al

Filing 84

ORDER ADOPTING 73 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 22, 2015. (rw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION MICHAEL LARON FORD v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 13-CV-6133 JAIL ADMINISTRATOR NATHAN GREELEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Now on this 22nd day of September 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July 15, 2015 (doc. 73), by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Plaintiff was given two extensions to file objections to the report and recommendation. (Docs. 78 & 80). Despite these extensions, Plaintiff failed to file timely, specific objections to the report and recommendation. Instead, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order compelling discovery (doc. 81) and a motion to appoint counsel (doc. 83). Defendants responded to the motion to compel (doc. 82), and the Court finds this motion (doc. 81) should be DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff was denied appointment of counsel three previous times in this case (docs. 34, 39 & 66). The third time Plaintiff was directed not to seek appointment of counsel again unless this matter was proceeding to trial (doc. 66). Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with that directive might result in his case being dismissed. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 83) is AO72A (Rev. 8/82) DENIED. The court sufficiently has reviewed advised, finds this as case and, follows: being The well and report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. is 41) GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 1) and supplements thereto (docs. 10 & 13) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?