Ford v. Greeley et al
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 73 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety as set forth. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 22, 2015. (rw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
MICHAEL LARON FORD
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 13-CV-6133
JAIL ADMINISTRATOR
NATHAN GREELEY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now on this 22nd day of September 2015, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July
15, 2015 (doc. 73), by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Plaintiff
was given two extensions to file objections to the report and
recommendation.
(Docs. 78 & 80).
Despite these extensions,
Plaintiff failed to file timely, specific objections to the report
and recommendation. Instead, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order
compelling discovery (doc. 81) and a motion to appoint counsel
(doc. 83).
Defendants responded to the motion to compel (doc. 82), and
the Court finds this motion (doc. 81) should be DENIED AS MOOT.
Plaintiff was denied appointment of counsel three previous times in
this case (docs. 34, 39 & 66).
The third time Plaintiff was
directed not to seek appointment of counsel again unless this
matter was proceeding to trial (doc. 66).
Plaintiff was advised
that failure to comply with that directive might result in his case
being dismissed. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 83) is
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
DENIED.
The
court
sufficiently
has
reviewed
advised,
finds
this
as
case
and,
follows:
being
The
well
and
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(doc.
is
41)
GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s
Complaint
(doc.
1)
and
supplements thereto (docs. 10 & 13) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?