Lackey v. Jane Doe #1 et al
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss and 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution are granted and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to obey the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 16, 2015. (lw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
NATHAN GORDON LACKEY
PLAINTIFF
V.
Civil No. 13-6142
JANE DOE #1 (attending
physician at the Ouachita
River Correctional Unit
ORCU); JANE DOE #2 (nurse
at ORCU); JANE DOE #3 (nurse
at ORCU); FNU (first name
unknown) GRAHAM; FNU COOK;
BILLY ROBERTSON; WILLIAM
MCLEAN; CASEY CASEY; CHEYENNE
BROOME; NANETTE VOWELL; PAUL
WALTER and DANIELLE HARTFORD
DEFENDANTS
O R D E R
On
this
16th
day
of
March
2015,
there
comes
on
for
consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case
on February 23, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United
States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas.
27).
(Doc.
No objections were filed to the report and recommendation.
The court has reviewed this case and, being well and
sufficiently
advised,
finds
as
follows:
The
report
and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in
its entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
(docs. 23 & 25) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to obey
the orders of this Court.
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?