Lackey v. Jane Doe #1 et al

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss and 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution are granted and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to obey the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 16, 2015. (lw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION NATHAN GORDON LACKEY PLAINTIFF V. Civil No. 13-6142 JANE DOE #1 (attending physician at the Ouachita River Correctional Unit ORCU); JANE DOE #2 (nurse at ORCU); JANE DOE #3 (nurse at ORCU); FNU (first name unknown) GRAHAM; FNU COOK; BILLY ROBERTSON; WILLIAM MCLEAN; CASEY CASEY; CHEYENNE BROOME; NANETTE VOWELL; PAUL WALTER and DANIELLE HARTFORD DEFENDANTS O R D E R On this 16th day of March 2015, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on February 23, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. 27). (Doc. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (docs. 23 & 25) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and to obey the orders of this Court. AO72A (Rev. 8/82) See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?