Henderson v. Norwood et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 20 Motion to Dismiss 1 Complaint, Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants 17 Motion to Dismiss is Denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 30, 2015. (hnc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION GREGORY SCOTT HENDERSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 6:13-cv-06147 SHERIFF DAVID NORWOOD; NATHAN GREELEY; TERRY WEST; DOUG WOODS; and RAY HOBBS DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 23). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) (ECF No. 20) be granted and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules and failed to prosecute this matter. Further, Defendant Hobb’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF no. 17) be denied as moot. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of March, 2015. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?