Henderson v. Norwood et al
ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 20 Motion to Dismiss 1 Complaint, Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants 17 Motion to Dismiss is Denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 30, 2015. (hnc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
GREGORY SCOTT HENDERSON
Case No. 6:13-cv-06147
SHERIFF DAVID NORWOOD;
NATHAN GREELEY; TERRY WEST;
DOUG WOODS; and RAY HOBBS
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant,
United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 23). Judge Bryant
recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) (ECF No. 20) be
granted and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice on the grounds that
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules and failed
to prosecute this matter. Further, Defendant Hobb’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF no. 17) be denied as
The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to
object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
in toto. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s
Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 17) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of March, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?