Salerno et al v. Datacom Systems Inc. et al
ORDER granting plaintiffs' 79 Motion for Attorney Fees, and defendants are directed to pay plaintiffs $465.00 in attorneys fees. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 24, 2014. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
FRANK SALERNO, JOANNE SALERNO,
FRANK MATARAZZO, and BARRY LEWIS
Civil No. 6:13-mc-00002
DATACOM SYSTEMS INC. and
DATACOM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees. ECF No. 79. Plaintiffs request their
attorneys fees for work performed contesting Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 67),
which the Court denied on January 29, 2014. Plaintiffs filed this Motion on January 31, 2014. Id.
Defendants have not filed a response, and the time to respond has expired.1 See Local Rule 7.2(b).
Consistent with the Court’s previous order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions (ECF
No. 76), the Court also awards Plaintiffs’ attorney fees contesting Defendants’ Motion for Protective
Order (ECF No. 67). Plaintiffs have filed an affidavit stating those fees were $465.00. ECF No. 791. The Court finds this amount is reasonable. Thus, Defendants are directed to pay Plaintiffs
$465.00 in attorneys fees.2
ENTERED this 24th day of February 2014.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants have notified the Court and opposing counsel by letter that they anticipate this
Motion being granted. Based upon this fact, Defendants have already paid these fees.
It appears Defendants may have already paid this amount to Plaintiffs. If so, Defendants need
not pay Plaintiffs twice.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?