London v. Kelley et al
Filing
61
JUDGMENT as set forth in the 56 Report and Recommendation, granting defendants' 41 & 49 Motions for summary judgment; further plaintiff's complaint and supplement thereto are dismissed with prejudice and plaintiff's 57 Motion to appoint counsel is denied. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 23, 2015. (rw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
BARRY D. LONDON
PLAINTIFF
v.
CASE NO. 14-CV-6017
WENDY KELLEY; DR. L. MURPHY;
DR. J. JONES; and DR. M. KIRK, JR.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
For reasons set forth in the report and recommendation
(Doc.
56)
and
the
Order
filed
contemporaneously
herewith,
Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 41 & 49) are
GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) and supplement thereto
(Doc. 23) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
motion (Doc. 57) is DENIED.
Further, Plaintiff’s
The parties have thirty days from
entry of this judgment on the docket in which to appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2015.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?