London v. Kelley et al

Filing 61

JUDGMENT as set forth in the 56 Report and Recommendation, granting defendants' 41 & 49 Motions for summary judgment; further plaintiff's complaint and supplement thereto are dismissed with prejudice and plaintiff's 57 Motion to appoint counsel is denied. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 23, 2015. (rw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION BARRY D. LONDON PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 14-CV-6017 WENDY KELLEY; DR. L. MURPHY; DR. J. JONES; and DR. M. KIRK, JR. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT For reasons set forth in the report and recommendation (Doc. 56) and the Order filed contemporaneously herewith, Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 41 & 49) are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) and supplement thereto (Doc. 23) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. motion (Doc. 57) is DENIED. Further, Plaintiff’s The parties have thirty days from entry of this judgment on the docket in which to appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2015. /s/ Robert T. Dawson Honorable Robert T. Dawson United States District Judge AO72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?